{"id":1528,"date":"2020-10-21T21:38:12","date_gmt":"2020-10-21T19:38:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/?p=1528"},"modified":"2020-10-21T21:38:12","modified_gmt":"2020-10-21T19:38:12","slug":"exclusive-indonesia-rejected-u-s-request-to-host-spy-planes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/exclusive-indonesia-rejected-u-s-request-to-host-spy-planes\/","title":{"rendered":"Exclusive: Indonesia rejected U.S. request to host spy planes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Exclusive: Indonesia rejected U.S. request to host spy planes<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tom Allard<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
The map above marks Indonesia’s Natuna Islands (point 4) which are geographically at the center of Indonesia\u2019s seaspace claim into the South China Sea \u2013 a claim which partly overlaps with China’s so-called nine-dash line that envelopes most of the South China Sea. (Map courtesy Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative via the Sydney Morning Herald)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

JAKARTA (Reuters) – Indonesia rejected this year a proposal by the United States to allow its P-8 Poseidon maritime surveillance planes to land and refuel there, according to four senior Indonesian officials familiar with the matter.<\/p>\n

U.S. officials made multiple \u201chigh-level\u201d approaches in July and August to Indonesia\u2019s defence and foreign ministers before Indonesia\u2019s president, Joko Widodo, rebuffed the request, the officials said.<\/p>\n

Representatives for Indonesia\u2019s president and defence minister, the U.S. State Department press office and the U.S. embassy in Jakarta did not respond to requests for comment. Representatives for the U.S. Department of Defence and Indonesia\u2019s foreign minister Retno Marsudi declined to comment.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Above is the Indonesian civil-military airport on Natuna Besar.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The proposition, which came as the U.S. and China escalated their contest for influence in Southeast Asia, surprised Indonesia\u2019s government, the officials said, because Indonesia has a long-standing policy of foreign policy neutrality. The country has never allowed foreign militaries to operate there.<\/p>\n

The P-8 plays a central role in keeping an eye on China\u2019s military activity in the South China Sea, most of which Beijing claims as sovereign territory. Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei have rival claims to the resource-rich waters, through which $3 trillion worth of trade passes each year.<\/p>\n

Indonesia is not a formal claimant in the strategically important waterway, but considers a portion of the South China Sea as its own. It has regularly repelled Chinese coast guard vessels and fishing boats from an area to which Beijing says it has a historic claim.<\/p>\n

But the country also has growing economic and investment links with China. It does not want to take sides in the conflict and is alarmed by growing tensions between the two superpowers, and by the militarisation of the South China Sea, Retno told Reuters.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe don\u2019t want to get trapped by this rivalry,\u201d Retno said in an interview in early September. \u201cIndonesia wants to show all that we are ready to be your partner.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cOVER-REACH\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/video\/?videoId=OVD0XTWTN&jwsource=em<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Despite the strategic affinity between the U.S. and Southeast Asian states in curbing China\u2019s territorial ambitions, Dino Patti Djalal, a former Indonesian ambassador to the United States, said the \u201cvery aggressive anti-China policy\u201d of the U.S. had unnerved Indonesia and the region.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s seen as out-of-place,\u201d he told Reuters. \u201cWe don\u2019t want to be duped into an anti-China campaign. Of course we maintain our independence, but there is deeper economic engagement and China is now the most impactful country in the world for Indonesia.\u201d<\/p>\n

Greg Poling, a Southeast Asia analyst from the Washington D.C.-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, said trying to get landing rights for spy planes was an example of clumsy over-reach.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s an indication of how little folks in the U.S. government understand Indonesia,\u2019 he told Reuters. \u201cThere\u2019s a clear ceiling to what you can do, and when it comes to Indonesia that ceiling is putting boots on the ground.\u201d<\/p>\n

The U.S. recently has used military bases in Singapore, the Philippines and Malaysia to operate P-8 flights over the South China Sea, military analysts said.<\/p>\n

China has ramped up military exercises this year, while the U.S. has increased the tempo of naval freedom of navigation operations, submarine deployments and surveillance flights.<\/p>\n

The P-8, with its advanced radar, high definition cameras and acoustic sensors, has been mapping the islands, surface and underwater realms of the South China Sea for at least six years.<\/p>\n

When carrying sonobuoys and missiles, the planes can detect and attack ships and submarines from long range. It also has communications systems that allow it to control unmanned aircraft.<\/p>\n

In 2014, the U.S. accused a Chinese fighter jet of coming within 20 feet and executing a barrel roll over a P-8 patrolling the South China Sea. China described the U.S. complaint as \u201cgroundless\u201d.<\/p>\n

Reporting by Tom Allard. Editing by Gerry Doyle<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Exclusive: Indonesia rejected U.S. request to host spy planes Tom Allard JAKARTA (Reuters) – Indonesia rejected this year a proposal by the United States to allow its P-8 Poseidon maritime surveillance planes to land and refuel there, according to four<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1529,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1528"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1534,"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528\/revisions\/1534"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/luftverteidigung.ch\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}